THE SCENE: For one of the most anticipated designer collaborations, H&M this time was duly prepared for the launch. There was a long line outside of the store, however once inside, the crowd was calm and controlled, an army of staff was available, and the ground floor of the H&M flaghip on 51st and 5th Avenue was completely rearranged to accommodate the day. An hour and a half into the doors opening, the racks and display tables were still neat and fully stocked with a range of clothe and accessories while peoplke seemed to mill about and wait in the other line at the back of the store to try on shoes. This was the most interesting part of the whole event: people had to go to the second floor to get a wristband and then proceed back down stairst o wait in line to be entered into the “shoe holding pen” in groups — on a time limit! Once you’re time was up, you had to get out of the ring and head right to the cashier, which was a row of waiting employees, one foot away. Kudos to H&M for finally figuring out how to properly manage these launches!
The COLLECTION: Although I’d been looking at pics online for ages, I realized that seeing the clothes and just looking at pictures of them can be two entirely different things! The clothing tended to be more of the evening sort and of on par quality with H&M, with embroidery and sequins galore, faux fur vest, jumpsuits, suede dresses, and plastic clutches, while the shoes were actually a little less exciting in person. My suggestion: less clothes, more shoes, overall lower price points.
If Jimmy Choo & H&M expect people to pay $100-$150 for four-inch-heels that provide zero padding or support, why won’t they just charge $50-$75? Lest we not forget that a designer collaboration in this nature is a teaming up of a designer brand with a lower-priced retailer — just because I’d like to pay less money for a pair of Jimmy Choos doesn’t mean that my tolerance of footpain would be any different than anyone who would pay $500 or $600 for a pair of shoes.
So in conclusion — good try, but I, and I think a lot of other people, would at least be willing to rationalize 4-inch-heels that are killers, for $49.99, but the pricing of this collection is a little too much to rationalize on that front. Even though we may be pinching pennies these days, there are certain things that just shouldn’t be sacrficied-like well-made, comfortable footwear. Walking over to the H&M flagship I dropped off three pairs of shoes that I love to be re-heeled and re-soled for a total of $60 — now that’s a deal!
Thanks for sharing, I was wondering how this all went!!
[…] In an effort to patch a completely botched story, I will pass you along to my good friend Julia at Fashion Pulse Daily. She was there, and she did a great write up on her site about the event. I love how she described […]
Thank you! I’m in love with one of the pairs of shoes specifically and noticed on H&M’s site that they’re recommending that you re-sole and re-heel before wearing. It would be worth it to me if the shoes are nice. I’ve paid more than $149 for crap and would kind of like to give these a try. Do you think I’ll be disappointed in the cheapness of them? (sending my husband to get them for me, that’s why I’m asking!)
Well….I think it depends on how often you plan to wear them, and what style you get — and hey if you’re husband is paying… 😉
thanks for your honest opinion. personally i figured that the shoes were too cheap to even bother. i will never pay for a shoe that kills my feet just to say–they are jimmy’s or anybodyelse. it just doesn’t make sense to me. and why would i pay $150 for some shoes and have to reheel and resole them prior to wearing them. give me a break.
ha! Well, I won’t wear them often. Every once in awhile we get invited to fun events like The Grammy’s or Sundance and I just thought they’d be a fun addition for the few times I have to get glam. I have ONE pair of Louboutin’s that I’ve worn approx 1634 times. Just keep wondering….should I just save the $150 and use it towards a “real” pair of shoes.
Hubby is going over there today. We’ll see a) if they even have them and b) if the quality sucks, I’ll have him take them back.
keep us posted!!!
[…] Wired covers Oprah’s decision to end The Oprah Winfrey Show. Fashion Pulse Daily wonders if Jimmy Choo for H&M was worth the wait. The Jet Set Girls see Dita von Teese bare it all at Paris’s Crazy Horse. Second City Style […]
[…] wear Donna Karan’s Infinity Dress Fashion Pulse Daily was there opening day and wonders was Jimmy Choo for H&M Worth the Wait? The Jet Set Girls see Dita Von Teese bare it all at the Crazy Horse in Paris. KRISTOPHER DUKES is […]
[…] Fashion Pulse Daily was there opening day and wonders was Jimmy Choo for H&M Worth the Wait? […]
[…] Fashion Pulse Daily was there opening day and wonders was Jimmy Choo for H&M Worth the Wait? […]
[…] Fashion Pulse Daily was there opening day and wonders was Jimmy Choo for H&M Worth the Wait? […]
[…] de la Renta Taylor Python. * Fashion Pulse Daily was there opening day and wonders, “was Jimmy Choo for H&M worth the wait?” * SheFinds found all the best patterned stockings and tights to keep your […]
[…] de la Renta Taylor Python. * Fashion Pulse Daily was there opening day and wonders, “was Jimmy Choo for H&M worth the wait?” * SheFinds found all the best patterned stockings and tights to keep your […]
[…] de la Renta Taylor Python. * Fashion Pulse Daily was there opening day and wonders, “was Jimmy Choo for H&M worth the wait?” * SheFinds found all the best patterned stockings and tights to keep your […]
[…] wear Donna Karan’s Infinity Dress Fashion Pulse Daily was there opening day and wonders was Jimmy Choo for H&M Worth the Wait?Real vs. Steal: I’m Not Obsessed covers Lauren Conrad’s All Black Look.The Jet Set Girls […]